Industry Associations

  • Republican National Lawyers Association
  • Surfing Lawyers Association

Bar & Court Admissions

  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Central, Eastern and Southern Districts of California

Professional Affiliations

Orange County Bar Association (Business Litigation Section)

Community Involvement

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

Education

Southwestern University School of Law, J.D.

University of Madrid, Spain

San Diego State University, B.A 

Photo of Jeffrey D. Farrow

Jeffrey D. Farrow

Partner
Orange County
T: 714.557.7990
F: 714.557.7991
Profile
Representative Matters
Newsroom
Video
Full Bio

Jeffrey Farrow is a skilled and versatile litigator in M&R's Commercial & Business Litigation Department. He routinely handles sophisticated business, commercial and employment matters in state and federal courts.

Mr. Farrow litigates a wide array of disputes across the country, for clients in the insurance; Internet, software and technology; and manufacturing and distribution industries. He advises business professionals, such as directors and officers of corporations and trade associations, on risk management practices that minimize the need for litigation. Mr. Farrow regularly represents clients in the insurance industry, including insurance agencies and brokerages, in claims that result from the purchase and sale of product lines, and in actions against departing owners for unfair competition and breached covenants-not-to-compete.

In addition to his many successes at trial, Mr. Farrow has obtained numerous victories in appellate courts. He has represented appellants, petitioners and respondents in many civil appeals and appellate writ proceedings.The courts have published several of Mr. Farrow’s opinions on cutting edge issues regarding officer and director liability, unfair competition and employment.

Community Involvement

Mr. Farrow is a member of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Committee, where he is involved in organizing the annual Orange County Walk.

Education

Mr. Farrow earned his J.D. from Southwestern University School of Law. While in law school, Mr. Farrow clerked for the Los Angeles City attorney, defending the city against officer-involved shooting lawsuits. He received his B.A.in Public Administration, summa cum laude, from San Diego State University.

Representative Matters

  • Breach of Contract Claims: A buyer was misled into purchasing commercial real property located on a closed landfill, information that was purposefully omitted from detailed disclosures by the seller and a report by a geotechnical company. Mr. Farrow quickly filed a lawsuit against the seller and the geotechnical company. He obtained evidence that the seller knowingly made false statements about the location of the landfill, and that the geotechnical company misread the testing data which, if interpreted correctly, would have disclosed the existence of the landfill. After successfully opposing two summary judgment motions, the defendants paid the buyer a multi-million dollar settlement.
  • Computer Trade Secrets: A young entrepreneur hired Mr. Farrow after his “life’s work” was stolen by a large corporation who claimed the work was owned by the company.  Mr. Farrow quickly filed a lawsuit for damages. After a four-year legal battle, pitting Mr. Farrow against some of the largest national law firms, the case went to trial. Mr. Farrow’s client obtained a multi-million dollar verdict that represents one of the largest awards in the United States for the misappropriation of computer trade secrets.
  • False Advertising: A longtime M&R client hired Mr. Farrow after discovering that a competitor was knowingly publishing false testing data about a competing product. Mr. Farrow sent a demand to cease letter. The competitor quickly accepted the letter, and paid damages caused by the unfair business practice.
  • Fraud AllegationsAfter pleading guilty to a long list of federal crimes for bribery and money laundering activities, an individual hired Mr. Farrow to respond to a civil lawsuit that sought to recover nearly $48 million earned through the criminal activity. Given the admissions of guilt and terms of the lengthy plea agreement, Mr. Farrow crafted a strategy to obtain dismissal of the civil lawsuit by arguing that, as a matter of law, the acts that gave rise to the federal crimes did not result in any civil liability to the individual. As expected, the trial court refused to dismiss the lawsuit and an appeal was quickly taken. The court of appeal agreed with Mr. Farrow’s argument and ordered that the lawsuit be dismissed, and that Mr. Farrow’s client recover his fees and costs on appeal.
  • Intellectual Property: Mr. Farrow represented a small company that was being threatened with legal action by a larger company that wanted to acquire it. It was believed that the threatened legal action was designed to “re-engage” merger discussions. Mr. Farrow, with the assistance of a team of M&R transactional attorneys, successfully designed and implemented a strategy to increase the purchase price of the acquisition target. In the end, the target was acquired at a 20 percent premium, and no legal action was filed.
  • Unfair Competition Claim: A longtime client of M&R hired Mr. Farrow when he discovered that an individual had set up a company with the same trademarked name and was trying to “take over” its identity and clients. Mr. Farrow quickly filed a lawsuit and obtained an injunction and judgment forever barring the defendant’s use of company name.
  • Unfair Competition:  A mid-sized insurance agency learned that a former employee had stolen its customer list and taken it to a large competitor. A significant number of clients then moved to the larger company based on faulty information that the larger company had acquired the smaller agency which was allegedly going out of business. Mr. Farrow immediately contacted the large competitor, issued a cease and desist demand, and gave notice of a hearing for an injunction.  The larger company quickly accepted all terms necessary to settle the claim, including disgorgement of all profits earned from the wrongfully solicited business, and agreed to cease all efforts to obtain business from a select group of clients.
  • Whistleblower Claims: Mr. Farrow represented a whistleblower in an accounting fraud case perpetrated by executives of a publicly-traded company.  When the company retaliated against Mr. Farrow’s client for reporting their illegal activities, Mr. Farrow negotiated a confidential settlement. The company executives were eventually convicted in federal court.

Published Decisions

Appellate
  • Klistoff v. Superior Court (City of South Gate) (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 469: Acted as lead counsel, obtaining positive result for our client in case alleging he could be held civilly liable for crimes that he had pled guilty to in federal court. The case was dismissed on demurrer. 

Media Mentions

Publications

Past Speaking Engagements