News Type: Articles

Jane Kutepova has written a smart and timely article in Area Development breaking down a question the construction industry can no longer afford to ignore: Who’s liable when AI starts making the decisions? As Jane explains, AI is now embedded in design, scheduling, safety, and equipment operation, yet most construction contracts still don’t account for it. That gap creates real exposure when algorithms go wrong, from faulty generative design outputs to missed hazards on busy jobsites. Jane’s thought leadership lays out the emerging risks and why it’s time for owners, contractors, and suppliers to rethink their agreements and address the rise of the AI clause. A terrific read on a fast-moving issue at the intersection of technology, risk, and the built environment.

Ruth Paley writes in FT Adviser about the expanding reach of corporate criminal liability, and why even the most sophisticated compliance programs can’t substitute for a culture of accountability. In her latest article titled, “Compliance rules are expanding but only culture can truly prevent,” Ruth explains how Section 196 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act, together with the proposed crime and policing bill, could expose companies to criminal liability for the acts of senior managers — this even absent knowledge or benefit. She explores the practical implications for boards, compliance officers, and leadership teams, emphasizing the urgent need to redefine governance, reporting, and cultural expectations across organizations.

Meredith Bobber Strauss has written an article for Law360 titled “$233M Disney Deal Shows Gravity Of Local Law Adherence,” which offers an incisive look at how Anaheim’s Measure L wage ordinance led to one of the largest wage and hour class action recoveries in California’s history. In the piece, Meredith explores how municipal wage laws—like Measure L—can transform long-standing subsidy agreements into significant compliance exposures, particularly for employers in the entertainment, hospitality, and tourism sectors. Her analysis offers valuable perspective on the growing impact of local wage governance and its reputational and financial implications for businesses nationwide.

Warren Koshofer and Seth Liebenstein break down the fast-evolving intersection of energy strategy, infrastructure, and law in POWER Magazine. Their article, “Power, Proximity, Policy: The Legal Landscape of Siting Data Centers Near Natural Gas Resources,” explains how data center developers—driven by the massive electricity demands of cloud computing, AI, and enterprise storage—are increasingly clustering facilities near abundant natural gas assets. This proximity offers access to stable, dispatchable power and established infrastructure, but also introduces a web of regulatory, environmental, and contractual complexities that require nuanced legal navigation.

Warren Koshofer explores how the Make America Beautiful Again (MABA) initiative redefines the intersection of environmental policy and economic opportunity in his latest article for Area Development titled “A New Era in Conservation and Economic Opportunity.” In this insightful piece, Warren breaks down how MABA’s incentive-based framework creates a path for businesses to engage in conservation and sustainability while driving growth and profitability across industries from energy to agriculture. An important read for executives navigating the evolving landscape of environmental and economic strategy.

Brandy Alonzo-Mayland was published in Law360 for her analysis of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Iloff v. LaPaille, which tightens the standard for employers asserting a “good faith” defense in minimum wage disputes. Her piece, “Calif. Justices Usher In Stricter Era For Wage Law Ignorance,” underscores a pivotal point: ignorance of wage obligations does not equal good faith. In California, employers must be proactive—documenting compliance and conducting regular wage audits—to avoid costly exposure.

Madison Dini has teamed up with Dr. Sheila Barbarino to publish an incredibly important article in Modern Aesthetics. Together, they tackle one of regenerative medicine’s hottest topics: the legal and regulatory complexities surrounding platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) injectables. From off-label uses to unapproved products, their article—assisted by research from Nicole Benalcazar, an MR associate awaiting bar results—provides crucial insights into how clinicians can navigate the gray zone between scientific innovation and compliance in aesthetic medicine.

Ling Kong unpacks the sweeping implications of New York’s proposed Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act in his latest article—this one for the New York Law Journal. This landmark legislation, which is poised to regulate “frontier” AI models developed or deployed in the state, could reshape compliance, governance, and incident reporting for the largest players in artificial intelligence. In his piece, Ling breaks down who’s covered, what’s required, and how counsel and clients can prepare for potential amendments before the bill reaches Governor Hochul’s desk. A must-read for anyone advising on high-stakes AI risk and regulation.