Subscribe to Our Monthly Newsletters

Stay updated on trending legal insights and get our attorneys' take on the latest industry news.

Marketing by

Paul Zimmerman
pzimmerman@mrllp.com
310.299.5500

Showing 21 posts in Intellectual Property.

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

NFTs and IP: What Owners And Sellers Need to Know

Blockchain technology is changing the world. With it has come a whole new category of investment opportunities, including non-fungible tokens—better known as NFTs—which have been fodder for headlines since breaking into the mainstream in 2021.

It’s the sky-high purchase prices of NFTs that’ve garnered most of the attention since they became popular last year. But behind these attention-grabbing transactions are the intellectual property considerations that NFT owners and sellers—brands included—must keep top of mind. (Read More)

Photo of M&R Blog

It’s Beginning to Sound a Lot Like Christmas: A Brief Overview of Holiday Songs and Their Copyright Implications

The holidays are just around the corner, which means the Christmas songs we know and love are soon to be heard over and over again. No doubt about it, it’s the most wonderful time of the year when it comes to the holiday standbys about to permeate the airwaves.

The month of December is especially wonderful for the lucky few cashing in on the music that brings such joy to the world. (Read More)

Photo of M&R Blog

arcady31 © 123RF.com

IP Deadlines and Fees Extended Under the CARES Act

The headlines coming out of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act becoming law have, in large part, been reserved for the financial relief, loans, and grants it provides for businesses and individuals nationwide. Lesser known, or reported, is the legislation’s impact on the intellectual property world. Yet to owners or would-be owners of IP, that aspect of the CARES Act is a big deal. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

congerdesign © pixabay.com

Blueberry Muffin Beer Not on Tap at the Trademark Office

As seen on www.craftbrewingbusiness.com:

How does a nice frosty Blueberry Muffin sound on a hot summer day? No, not the baked variety, but a blueberry muffin-flavored beer brought to you by the folks at Humboldt Street Collective LLC, dba Great Notion Brewing and Barrel House. If such a brew sounds appealing, that’s great, but you won’t be finding it under the BLUEBERRY MUFFIN trademark. And that’s because the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (“TTAB”) refused to register the word mark BLUEBERRY MUFFIN, which Great Notion Brewing recently applied for. The TTAB determined that Blueberry Muffin is a generic term that should be available to describe any beer having a blueberry muffin-like flavor, and not just Great Notion Brewing’s product. But the decision is a questionable one. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

Rabia Elif Aksoy © 123RF.com

Note to Copyright Owners: Register Your Original Work

Are you in the business of creating, acquiring, owning, publishing, licensing or financing original works entitled to copyright protection, such as books, movies, sound recordings, musical compositions, audio/visual works, software, photos, artwork, or articles? If so, the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com should be of interest. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

rawpixel.com

Some Things Just Can’t Be Settled Over a Beer

The craft brewing industry is focused on its beer, not the courtroom. Indeed, the culture within the space is one of collaboration and compromise, which is why very few beer makers sue over trademark issues, In many ways, this is what makes the craft brewing space – and its product—so special. But despite the spirit of cooperation within their world, there is a time for craft brewers to throw down and litigate—or, at the very least, to issue cease and desist letters in the wake of trademark violations. The question is, when is a more aggressive stance necessary? (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

lightwise © 123RF.com

Paul McCartney Sues Sony/ATV to Reclaim Copyrights to Beatles Songs

Sir Paul McCartney has filed suit against Sony/ATV Music Publishing in New York Federal Court, seeking a declaration that he can exercise his termination rights under the Copyright Act of 1976 in order to reclaim the rights to many of his musical compositions for The Beatles. The songs, which McCartney either wrote, or co-wrote with John Lennon, and which were once owned by pop music star Michael Jackson, are immensely valuable. It is anticipated that Sony/ATV may challenge the former Beatle’s termination notices in order to preserve its rights. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

studiom1 © 123RF.com

A Different Route: Challenging Orange Book Patents Via Inter Partes Review

Since the passage of the America Invents Act (AIA) in 2012, and the corresponding implementation of the inter partes review (IPR) process, patent challengers have been utilizing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) as an alternative venue for patent adjudication. The IPR process permits anyone other than the patent owner to challenge a patent's validity for alleged obviousness or lack of novelty based on patents or printed publications. This has become an increasingly popular avenue for challenging “orange book” pharmaceutical patents, many of which are simultaneously at issue in Hatch-Waxman / Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation in the federal courts. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

arcady31 © 123RF.com

Courts and Patent Litigants Continue to Wrestle With Scope of Supreme Court’s Alice Test

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2014 Alice ruling – which established that abstract ideas implemented on a computer are not patent-eligible – has fostered significant confusion regarding what exactly can and cannot be patented. A new case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Thales Visionix Inc. v. US (case no. 15-5150), perfectly illustrates the potential negative ramifications of overbroad application of the Alice test for patent holders. (Read More)

Intellectual Property
Photo of M&R Blog

Alexey Laputin © 123RF.com

German High Court Copyright Decision Indicates Potential Limits on Sample Clearance Requirements 

Concluding nearly two decades of litigation, Germany's highest court has now ruled in favor of a hip-hop artist who used a two-second sample of music from the pioneering electro-pop band Kraftwerk without first obtaining consent or a license to use the sample. Ralf Hütter of Kraftwerk filed suit against Moses Pelham, the producer of the song "Nur Mir" (Only Me) by Sabrina Setlur, for infringing the copyright of Kraftwerk's 1977 recording, "Metal on Metal.” The song's highly recognizable drum loop comprises a foundational thematic element of the group's "Trans Europe Express" album, and has been paid extensive tribute by artists who used imitative musical phrasing going back to the early 1980's electronic music scene. The two-second sample is featured throughout the allegedly infringing recording. Hütter alleged that Pelham's nonconsensual use constituted copyright infringement. Sampling, in which material of one's own or of others' creation is reused, is a common stylistic element in contemporary music, particularly in hip-hop. (Read More)