Get updates by email
Topics
Contributors
- Sanford L. Michelman
- Matthew R. Lasky
- Robert P. Barbarowicz
- T. Darren Barker
- Robert N. Berg
- Ronald R. Camhi
- Peter F. Cifichiello
- Jesse Contreras
- Robert D. Estrin
- Jeffrey D. Farrow
- Taylor C. Foss
- Samantha Gavin
- Kelly M. Hagemann
- Janeen R. Hall
- Mona Z. Hanna
- David F. Hauge
- Ryan Hong
- Marc R. Jacobs
- Robin James
- David D. Johnson
- Warren A. Koshofer
- Dana A. Kravetz
- Jesse S. Krompier
- Vincent S. Loh
- Kathryn T. Lundy
- Scott T. Lyon
- Jennifer A. Mauri
- Kathleen M. McCain
- Amanda K. Pawlyk
- Michael S. Poster
- Eric J. Rans
- Jeremy D. Richardson
- Mark B. Robinson
- Ian Shane
- Lara A. H. Shortz
- Adam Z. Solomon
- Justin A. Stein
- Peter L. Steinman
- Todd H. Stitt
- Raymond L. Vandenberg
- Stacey L. Zill
- Marc B. Zimmerman
Archives
Contact
Paul Zimmerman
pzimmerman@mrllp.com
310.299.5500
Showing 3 posts from October 2017.
dotshock © 123RF.com
Tip Credits and the Multitasking Hospitality Employee
There is good news for employers in the hospitality space coming out of the Ninth Circuit. The court in Marsh v. J. Alexander’s, LLC recently ruled that tipped employees who also perform non-tip-generating work cannot state a claim for violation of the tip credit provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act. As otherwise stated, employees, such as servers and bartenders, who occasionally handle “discrete related tasks” over the course of any given shift that are intermingled with duties directed at earning tips remain subject to tip credits (at least in those states that allow tip credits – California is not one of them). (Read More)
blueskyimage © 123RF.com
Salary Inquiries Becoming A Thing Of The Past
Attention employers in California, you are the latest to be prohibited from asking questions about a job applicant’s compensation history, a move designed to close the gender pay gap. (Read more)
FEDERICA TREMOLADA © 123RF.com
And on the Seventh Day, We Rest...Sometimes
The Labor Code in California appears to be pretty clear where it states that employees cannot work more than six consecutive days without a day of rest. But as is so common in the law, even this seemingly straightforward rule is subject to interpretation. And that’s exactly what the Ninth Circuit has done – with the help of some guidance from the California Supreme Court – in Mendoza v. Nordstrom Inc. (Read More)