Get updates by email
Topics
Contributors
- Sanford L. Michelman
- Matthew R. Lasky
- Robert P. Barbarowicz
- Robert N. Berg
- Ronald R. Camhi
- Peter F. Cifichiello
- Jesse Contreras
- Robert D. Estrin
- Jeffrey D. Farrow
- Taylor C. Foss
- Samantha Gavin
- Kelly M. Hagemann
- Mona Z. Hanna
- David F. Hauge
- Ryan Hong
- Marc R. Jacobs
- Bryan Johnson
- Warren A. Koshofer
- Dana A. Kravetz
- Vincent S. Loh
- Jennifer A. Mauri
- Amanda K. Monroe
- Michael S. Poster
- Eric J. Rans
- Richard Reice
- Mark B. Robinson
- Ian Shane
- Lara A. H. Shortz
- Adam Z. Solomon
- Peter L. Steinman
- Todd H. Stitt
Archives
Contact
Paul Zimmerman
pzimmerman@mrllp.com
310.299.5500
Showing 2 posts from 2009.
Jirsak/Depositphotos.com
US Supreme Court Permits Unions to Agree to Arbitrate Discrimination Claims
The U.S. Supreme Court, in 14 Penn Plaza LLC et al. v. Pyett et al. , a decision issued last week, held that a union and an employer can agree that employee discrimination claims will be submitted to arbitration only, and will not be filed in court. The Court overruled its 1974 decision that had long been relied upon by employment lawyers for the proposition that unions could not negotiate away an employee’s right to sue in court for discrimination. (Read More)
eye4detail © 123RF.com
California Agency Pays Unemployment Benefits to Workers Terminated for Misconduct
A California agency erroneously paid out $1.3 million in unemployment benefits to workers that had been fired for misconduct – a stunning 25% of the unemployment benefits paid by the agency in the year. An outside auditor found that the agency repeatedly failed to provide adequate documentation regarding the terminated employees, and failed to respond within deadlines set by the California Employment Development Department (EDD). (Read More)